Talk:Interstate 99

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

What should have this interstate been numbered[edit]

I'm seeing it mentioned twice that this highway violates AASHTO's numbering scheme since its between I-79 and I-81. However, aside from being hinted at in a statement by Bud, it's never indicated what number the route should have been given. - ʄɭoʏɗiaɲ τ ¢ 06:55, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The most logical answer is a three-digit spur route, but it's original research to say what the number should have been. The archive has a section on this topic. – TMF 21:20, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The other possibility would be calling it I-81, with I-81 redesignated I-83 and I-83 redesignated as a spur route thereof (like I-183) and I-283 redesignated something like I-776. That'd give us the most elegant final solution but obviously would probably be considered prohibitively disruptive. Powers T 21:04, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The link from I80 to I86 in New York opened[edit]

That final five or so mile stretch was finally completed and opened in October. http://www.the-leader.com/article/20131008/NEWS/131009730 Interestingly, Google maps knew about it and it was showing up as I-99 but it has since been removed. B137 (talk) 20:56, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Updated map[edit]

Although this article does have a map, I went ahead and tagged it as needing a map because it needs updated to reflect the addition of the New York section of I-99, and possibly a dotted line to show where the two sections would connect with each other. With regards to making a map, I would not put a dotted line down to I-68 yet at this time, as it appears that PennDOT isn't extending it south yet at this point. Jgera5 (talk) 17:50, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You'll have to make a request at Wikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Roads/Maps task force/Requests. --WashuOtaku (talk) 22:56, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
OK thanks. I knew there was a link for that, but I couldn't find it to save my life. Jgera5 (talk) 15:37, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Interstate 99. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:14, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Interstate 99. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:51, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]