Talk:Interstate 695 (Massachusetts)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Bridges over Storrow Drive near Kenmore.[edit]

Right near Kenmore Square I had read somewhere that those tan/oramge painted causeways which span over Storrow Drive. (The Southern Side of the Charles River.) were supposed to continue on into some sort of Bridge that was to span the Charles and be included in something like this Inner Belt plan as well. Has anyone heard/seen anything similar??? I think it was in the Globe or Herald or something.

But supposedly that plan too was scrapped now you just have the Bridges that literally lead from Kenmore Square Area--- that tower up to the edge of the Charles River and currently bank/turn hard to the right (for heading Inbound on Storrow Drive) and bank hard to the left at the same spot towards Storrow outbound) just as it approaches the Charles River. Infact I think it peaks out slightly over the Charles on the shoulder that leads towards Storrow Westbound I think if my memory serves me correctly. I do recall it certainly eats into the riverfront park area there. The BEST time to actually walk around and look at it closely is after the July 4 fireworks. Most traffic around there is stopped and you can really get up under those roadways and look at how they were constructed. I recall that article beceause just like Route 2 looks very out of place in the mannor it terminates, this Kenmore Square/Storrow Drive terminus looks very out of place as well.

P.S. There's still hope for Route 2. If the powers that be either place the Commuter rail near Alewife undergound, -or- placed Route 2 underneath the Commuter rail's right-of-way that could make Route 2 terminate closer to North Station almost. CaribDigita 04:53, 16 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The inner belt was supposed to connect with a highway on what is now the Orange Line corridor. The ramps you are talking about would not have been able to carry the traffic. Also the commuter rail right-of-way is nowhere near wide enough for a 6 (much less 8) lane Route 2 extension. --agr 11:58, 16 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Correct- not 6 lanes... However it could handle 2 in each direction 4 total. If the tracks were recessed as they are at Porter Square it would probably be similar to route 9 in appearence or- the stretch of route 2 just before you enter into Cambridge. The 8 lanes you speak of don't currently extend into Cambridge from route 2. The 8 lane part is only just after the exits for Belmont and I believe begins to shed lanes after the exit to Route 128. I noticed that the Fresh Pond Parkway bridge over the Commuter Rail is about as wide as the gravel laden area of the Commuter Rail tracks below. (that bridge over the tracks has 4 total traffic lanes.) I only mentioned the commuter rail because when you're on top of that bridge and glance towards the shoping centre you can see Boston in the distance. The Commuter rail right-of-way is far more direct-- in terms of heading towards Boston. Traffic continuing on Fresh Pond Parkway are being lead in directions that aren't immediately heading towards Boston. The routes through Cambridge head either south or north (mostly) first, before they head east. I wouldn't recommend this road for 18 wheeler trucks but for small vehicle traffic it could work. CaribDigita 00:06, 5 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The Inner Belt was to cross the Charles at the BU Bridge. The ramps you are talking about were built ca. 1965 to replace a configuration that had weaving between the ramps to and from westbound Storrow and provide an overpass over Beacon Street and Comm Ave. Remember that US 1 used to use Charlesgate and Storrow. --SPUI (T - C) 07:47, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Excellent thank you, I finally remember where I had seen it I stopped by the MIT coop and found a book on the history of the Charles River. I glanced through it and I think---- I somehow thought the blueprints being shown of the BU Bridge were of the Kenmore area. I didn't take a long look at it, it was something I was flipping through and didn't really analyze deeply in terms of what I was looking at. Thanks for clearifying all of that for me though. The image it showed- I later saw thru one of the links here as one of the renditions of the BU Bridge plans. CaribDigita 00:13, 5 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Are the Leverett ramps really in Somerville? I thought that it actually is Charlestown maybe 1000 yards west of I-93. 12.0.44.226 (talk) 17:55, 15 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Name[edit]

It seems to me this article should be named Inner Belt. Per WP:NAME "Generally, article naming should prefer what the greatest number of English speakers would most easily recognize, with a reasonable minimum of ambiguity, while at the same time making linking to those articles easy and second nature." The project was always known as the Inner Belt and would likely still be called that today had it been built. No one refers to the Big Dig as I-93.--agr (talk) 01:25, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hmmm. It is worth considering. I did a quick Yahoo search. Came up with a few hits near the top of the search regarding Boston's "Inner Belt". I did notice that "Inner Belt" currently redirects here. CaribDigita (talk) 02:34, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Interstate 695 (Massachusetts). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:41, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Interstate_695_(Massachusetts)&oldid=1198689152"