Talk:International reactions to the Saffron Revolution

Myanmar High‑importance

International reactions to the Saffron Revolution is within the scope of WikiProject Myanmar, a project to improve all Myanmar related articles on Wikipedia. The WikiProject is also a part of the Counteracting systemic bias group on Wikipedia aiming to provide a wider and more detailed coverage on countries and areas of the encyclopedia which are notably less developed than the rest. If you would like to help improve this and other Myanmar-related articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome.MyanmarWikipedia:WikiProject MyanmarTemplate:WikiProject MyanmarMyanmar articles

High

This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

To-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : offices, ministries and politicians of current cabinet, requested articles on Burmese subjects and articles on smaller towns and villages
Expand : Top-importance and High-importance articles
Photo : add photos of incumbent politicians
Stubs : Category:Myanmar stubs
Update : offices, ministries and politicians of current cabinet after 2015 election
Other : If you know Burmese, go on the Myanmar Wikipedia and make sure each article on the English Wikipedia has one in Burmese also

There's now been a UN Security Council statement on the subject, which might be worth adding. --Delirium 06:01, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Perfect resource for quotes on the Myanmar issue, if anyone has the time to upload them: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/7014704.stm -- Permafrost 07:25, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Chile's reaction[edit]

You may add this official declaration from the Foreing Affairs Ministry of Chile. I'm not a english languaje user, so comebody can help me! :) Rakela 19:52, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the information! I have updated the article.--Burzum 09:00, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I also think that it would be good to add quotes from the EU and the UN, since they have been notable in the media - especially with the UN General Assembly meeting, Ban Ki Moon's statements and the UN Security Council meeting over the matter. -- Permafrost 11:53, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vietnam source?[edit]

I've removed the Vietnam bit("In Vietnam, this topic is banned. No media can report about this event though it had lasted for several days."). It is not only oddly worded, but unsourced, despite the fact that it should be. Anybody have something?Circeus 18:58, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, found something on a blog, which was echoed by BBC. This will have to do in the meantime. Circeus 19:10, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Related template[edit]

{{User burfreedemo}} produces

This user strongly advocates freedom and democracy in Myanmar.

Chris 03:15, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nice one. Thanks.Soewinhan (talk) 07:48, 31 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on International reactions to the Saffron Revolution. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080223100615/http://www.mizzima.com/MizzimaNews/News/2007/Sep/today-demonstration.html to http://www.mizzima.com/MizzimaNews/News/2007/Sep/Today-demonstration.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:39, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on International reactions to the Saffron Revolution. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:37, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]