Talk:Internal waters

International relations: Law Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject International law.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Internal waters. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160402114448/http://www.canada.com/ottawacitizen/news/story.html?id=6d4815ac-4fdb-4cf3-a8a6-4225a8bd08df&k=73925 to http://www.canada.com/ottawacitizen/news/story.html?id=6d4815ac-4fdb-4cf3-a8a6-4225a8bd08df&k=73925

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:23, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Is this different from "inland waters"?[edit]

I'm not sure if this is a past discussion that got lost in wikidata or wikipedia merges. Apologies, if it is. Would this concept include the term, inland waters? Wikidata has the (en)land waters for which there is no wikipedia article. It might have been incorrectly merged or edited to now have a problematic or imprecise label in English. Many scholarly works with the phrase, "inland water," point to that item and I wonder if they should point to the wikidata item for internal waters ... See [1] for the recent edit of 420 scholarly article items to point to "land waters" or maybe better "inland waters". Trilotat (talk) 11:38, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]