Talk:Indian English literature

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Indian literature workgroup (assessed as Top-importance).
	This article was last assessed in November 2015.

The article is not comprehensive enough.

What does IWE mean? There is no explanation anywhere in the text. 134.96.65.123 13:08, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Indo-nostalgic should be merged into this as it is even shorter than this section.

References -- Parthasarathy[edit]

Ten Twentieth-Century Indian Poets was published in 1976 not 1977, as listed on the copyright page. And "Twentieth-Century" is hypenated as on the title page. And sorry to anyone that favors "U P" for "University Press", I just favor the latter and think it looks better on the page; but of course this is just a point of style and entirely up for discussion or argumentation. Thanks, Galo1969X 06:15, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This Para is long and Rambling[edit]

"Many popular writers from Indian origin today go very far in terms of modesty to hand over the reins of inspiration to new found lands, new found freedoms of expression contained in their writing.............. all offer delectable samples of IWE."

IMHO it requires clean-up and focus. I do not quite understand the point being made. I think the article will suffer little, if the entire para is deleted. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 155.181.15.80 (talk) 21:20, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sanjeev Kumar Solanki[edit]

I removed two references about this completely unknown author that have no business being in what is otherwise a fine article. He is a red link for the good reason that there is absolutely nothing to be found about him in VIAF or World Cat, and google results only return this article. If he is not a complete hoax, he is definitely not a notable writer. Xuxl (talk) 16:16, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]