Talk:In Praise of Limestone

In Praise of Limestone has been listed as one of the Language and literature good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
September 1, 2007	Good article nominee	Listed

A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on August 27, 2007.

I've noticed that internet pages offering this poem all use the word "incomprehensible" instead of "comprehensible", so are wrong at least once. –Outriggr ♠ 05:35, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article[edit]

This is a very thoughtful piece which clearly meets all the GA criteria. Very good work! Johnfos 06:14, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Auden's revisions[edit]

It may be worthwhile to have a discussion of Auden's revisions of this poem-- the original edition, which is still extant in some places has the following

        What could be more like Mother or a fitter background
           For her son, the flirtatious male who lounges
       Against a rock in the sunlight displaying his dildo, never doubting[10]
           That for all his faults he is loved; whose works are but
       Extensions of his power to charm? … (ll. 11–15)

Auden often had second thoughts about his poems and on occaision would revise them-- September1,1939 being a notorious example, where he excised whole stanzas and then finally wanted to ditch the whole poem. The noted poet and critic David Lehman frequently criticized his revisions and had a preference for his orignal works.Bwthemoose 16:46, 20 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I did mention this in the footnote on the replaced line, but feel free to add an explanation in the text itself. –Outriggr § 20:57, 20 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]