Talk:Illacme plenipes
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Untitled[edit]
I am impressed :) I cam across [1] and checked Wikipedia to find that an article already exists. Shyamal 06:59, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
Can we get a picture of an Illacme plenipes on this article? That would be really interesting.
External links modified[edit]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Illacme plenipes. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added
{{dead link}}tag to http://www.vmnh.net/content/File/Research_and_Collections/Myriapodologica/Myriapodologica_v4_n4.pdf. - Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080207060654/http://dsc.discovery.com/news/2006/06/08/millipede_ani.html?category=animals to http://dsc.discovery.com/news/2006/06/08/millipede_ani.html?category=animals
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:31, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
750 is not a multiple of 4[edit]
Hi the maths doesn't check out. Can anyone explain how an animal that grow 4 legs on each segment ends up with 750 legs? Do some get eaten/lost from damage or what? An explanation of that where it mentions the record 750 legs would be good. — Preceding unsigned comment added by NickPriceNZ (talk • contribs) 06:17, 22 April 2019 (UTC)