Talk:Ijji

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

I moved Golf Kind and Pocket Masters into Casual, neither of them are arcade games. I also added a few of the casual games that were left out of the list. I also feel the Criticisms sub-section should be removed; if we're just adding in information about glitches, why not list all of them from every game? ~_~ The major fanbase of Gunz bases their play style off of an enormous glitch, they're just things you exploit and use to your advantage rather than a problem to actually whine about in an encyclopedia article. Jitunu 03:41, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Game Launchers overlapping hosted games[edit]

It seems the game launchers are overlapping the hosted game section, despite my best efforts I can't fix this problem, anyone care to chip in? --Airsoftgeek (talk) 23:56, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed the problem right good. --Airsoftgeek (talk) 02:31, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

About Golf King and Pocket Masters[edit]

Those two games don't belong in the Casual Section since on the ijji homepage they are listed as being Sports. I've moved those games to a new section. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 125.238.5.233 (talk) 07:03, 17 April 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Site Revenue[edit]

Can someone post information on the web sites method of obtaining revenue? For safety and security it is important for parents to know if the sites income is through chargeable games, banner ads or browser hijacking. The site is too new for very much in the way of search engine documentation.Kdickson 14:13, 22 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

One way of revenue I know of is the purchase of "gcoins" or something to that effect the site uses this fictional currency purchased with real currency to buy items in the gamesAtomic1fire 22:17, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There's an interview by Gamasutra here that touches on the revenue subject. Torinir ( Ding my phone My support calls E-Support Options ) 17:55, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

170 billion dollars? are you kidding me? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.132.95.150 (talk) 13:17, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Someone may want to start adding reliable sourcing[edit]

Such as media attention from IGN [1]. I'd hate to see a reasonably notable site get hit with an AFD over notability, but it should have external sourcing in the article. Torinir ( Ding my phone My support calls E-Support Options ) 17:59, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reliable sourcing and non-biased "first personish" writing. I'm gonna try and clean up what's there right now.Youkai no unmei 21:28, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, KwonHo has officially been dropped, so I removed it from its list of games at the top of the page. If there are any objects please post them here, LOL. Dnlkk94 (talk) 19:35, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ijji's unreliability[edit]

I've searched the ijji forums for a technical issue in two of its game affiliates (gunz and gunbound) Both issues were listed under "known issues" but neither one has been attempted to be fixed for at least a year. Can we get some information on how this seems to be a common problem? (there were a couple hundred complaints related to the same issues.) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.10.117.195 (talk) 07:32, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A couple hundred complaints out of 9 million users. How big of a problem is that? If these are an issue, reliable sources will comment on them and they might be considered relevant to the article.--Crossmr (talk) 08:17, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

ijji got a new logo that so the picture needs to be updated. 1wolfblake (talk|contribs) 12:56, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Nooodles (talk) 22:24, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Game Masters and Customer Service Representative[edit]

Keep or delete? wolfblake 18:41, 20 March 2010 (UTC)

Delete. This content is pure directory/boasting record. Nowhere on wikipedia will you find an editor with knowledge of policy who well tell you a list of forum members and moderators is encyclopedic content. Please remove it--Jac16888Talk 21:46, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

New Tables for Hosted and discounted games[edit]

Added this to make the page more clear and it looks better then using a standard list. On a side note, Should we keep the GameMaster for the games on the tables or should it be removed indefinitely?Airsoftgeek (talk) 05:03, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

a list of discontinued is not noteworthy and I have removed it, the list of games is not exactly important either since they're 3rd party. And yes, the "gamemasters" should be removed, they don't belong here--Jac16888Talk 14:02, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]


I have to disagree with you there, I've seen many game portals with a list of current games hosted at the site. You also can't say Genesis AD is a 3rd party game since it was partly developed by NHNUSA. Please don't remove something that's been there since before you started editing Ijji wiki simply because you disagree with it. --Airsoftgeek (talk) 14:40, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WP:OTHERSTUFF. The fact something has been there a while doesn't give it a free pass. If there are 1st party games then include them, anything else is irrelevent--Jac16888Talk 14:46, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This feels like a massive advertisement.[edit]

The wording is . . . very commercial. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bipedal (talk • contribs) 07:32, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Cleanup[edit]

I have posted a cleanup template for the following reasons:

1. The section's title does not follow Wikipedia standards. The title should be changed from "ijji hacked" (by the way, the "hacked" in the title should have been capitalized anyways) to something like "Controversy".

2. The section is placed too high. It should belong below "History of ijji Games".

3. The section's content does not read from a neutral point of view. The editor also used substandard English and more opinions than facts.

4. Going along with point 3. The opinions do not have any references to back them up. In fact, most of the section's content does not have any references.

5. Going along with point 4. The editor placed links inside the section when they should belong to the reference section. Instead of the links at the bottom of the section's content, usage of inline references are preferable. (As per the Wikipedia:Citing sources page).

When there points have been addressed and further cleanup have been made. Please remove the cleanup template and this post. HydroArgentum (talk) 02:33, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Ijji. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:20, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Ijji&oldid=1200131947"