Talk:I Capuleti e i Montecchi

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

Please note that I am the author of the synopsis that appears on Opera japonica and I am making it available on Wikipedia.

This can be confirmed by writing to Simon.Holledge@operajaponica.org

I wasn't sure whether to give my name (Simon Holledge) as author. How does this work? Should I credit the original publication?

Kleinzach 00:42, 3 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for contributing this fine article. The copyright notice will bring it to the attention of an administrator, who will no doubt be in touch soon to check with you about the ownership of the rights, which presumably you retained yourself when you published it on Opera Japonica. The thing will then be (I think) to leave a little notice at the bottom stating that it's reproduced with permission from Opera Japonica, though I'm not sure offhand of the exact wording. Best wishes Flapdragon 00:51, 3 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
The copyright violation procedure doesn't seem to have been correctly followed as the article was never listed on the Wikipedia:Copyright_problems. This should have been done by the person raising the issue. --David Woolley 19:10, 7 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]


Thanks. I am also the publisher of Opera japonica. A permission note would be ideal from my point of view if someone can tell me how this is done. This is my first Wikipedia day! Kleinzach 01:07, 3 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome. I hope I haven't put you off! I'm sure your knowledge will be great asset. Flapdragon 01:21, 3 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

{{confirmation|source=http://www.operajaponica.org}}

Title (don't trust google)[edit]

I (The) Capuleti (Capulets) e (and) i (the) Montecchi (Montagues). Anyway, if somebody wants to verify the Italian titles, please go to it.wiki. Thanks from Italy. --Al pereira 00:29, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I believe this article title is the correct one, and yes the other one (which has some good information) should be merged into this one. - Kleinzach 08:42, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I have now completed the merge - in the absence of any objections from anyone - and replaced I Capuleti ed i Montecchi with a redirect. Kleinzach 15:21, 18 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Music section[edit]

Completely unreferenced and reads like somebody's personal opinion. Romeo is the last breeches role hero? What about Octavian? Etc. --GuillaumeTell 17:42, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I've just discovered that the whole section is a word-for-word copyvio from the article in Grove Opera, so I'm going to delete it. --GuillaumeTell 17:58, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Did Alboni perform the role of Romeo?[edit]

According to the repertoire drawn up by Arthur Pougin, Marietta Alboni is not reported to have ever performed the Bellini role of Romeo, but only Vaccai's one. I have not found any other source stating otherwise.--Jeanambr (talk) 16:12, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. I have removed that assertion for now. It can always be restored if someone can find a reference for it, although I'll be very surprised if they do. Voceditenore (talk) 16:38, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem removed[edit]

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://www.oxfordmusiconline.com/grovemusic/view/10.1093/gmo/9781561592630.001.0001/omo-9781561592630-e-5000004891. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Mdaniels5757 (talk) 17:03, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]