Talk:ICivics

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Education Low‑importance

	Education portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of education and education-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EducationWikipedia:WikiProject EducationTemplate:WikiProject Educationeducation articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Can you give me advice on how to comply comply with NPOV? I've read http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view and I cite to neutral, positive and negative sources. Carolyn rosenthal (talk) 14:36, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Much of the introduction previously had content which explained the opinion and mission of the founder, outside of quotes. I have tried to make the language more neutral while understanding that almost all of the information available on iCivics is written by the organization or softball interviewers, and thus will not be neutral. I am new to editing but it seems a central conceit of NPOV is not only the use of varied sources but also crafting each sentence as a statement of fact and focusing a lot less on the opinions and goals of the people involved.Online dave (talk) 18:58, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]