Talk:Hurricane Cleo

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleHurricane Cleo has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
January 4, 2008Good article nomineeListed
On this day...A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on September 5, 2023.

Todo[edit]

The impact section is basically a collection of stubs. The intro mentions nothing of impact. Jdorje 21:02, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It has been significantly improved. I think I've done all I can with internet sources. Thegreatdr (talk) 06:04, 25 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

GAC consideration[edit]

It looks good. GAC it if you want. Juliancolton (talk) 21:27, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Already have two articles I've been working on that are nominated as good articles right now, effects of tropical cyclones and tropical cyclone forecasting. The GAC for this article will have to wait for one of those articles to clearly pass or fail. Past experience has taught me that two articles under review at a time is my upper limit. Thegreatdr (talk) 22:50, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
It has been GACed. Thegreatdr (talk) 22:00, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Successful good article nomination[edit]

I am glad to report that this article nomination for good article status has been promoted. This is how the article, as of January 4, 2008, compares against the six good article criteria:

1. Well written?: Check
2. Factually accurate?: Check
3. Broad in coverage?: Check
4. Neutral point of view?: Check
5. Article stability? Check
6. Images?: Check

I have made about 13 subsequent edits since my first visit here, all minor—with most being done to grammar, use of ndash, conversion templates and the dablink towards the top which I shortened. Most of these edits were to keep the article consisent. A very good job, and I am willing to pass this article. Well done. If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it to Good article reassessment. Thank you to all of the editors who worked hard to bring it to this status, and congratulations. Rt. 14:32, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tornadoes spawned by storm[edit]

I also proposed in Talk:Hurricane Hilda about a category for Tornadoes of 1964 because Cleo spawned seven tornadoes in South Carolina including an F2 in Mount Pleasant on August 29 and Hurricane Hilda spawned an F4 tornado in Butte La Rose, Louisiana on October 3. There were two non-tropical tornado events including an F5 in Wichita Falls, Texas on April 3 and an outbreak that spawned another F5 in Bradshaw, Nebraska on May 5. Just like Hurricane Carla is included in the Tornadoes of 1961 category why not have these two storms in a new category for the 1964 season with articles for 1964 Wichita Falls tornado and May 1964 tornado outbreak?--Kevjgav (talk) 16:12, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reanalysed Future[edit]

I have read a reanalysed thesis from NOAA on the storm and it says that Cleo joins the list of Florida major Hurricanes. I could be wrong though. LlayReactorUltra (talk) 07:20, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hurricane Cleo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:12, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hurricane Cleo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:15, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Hurricane Cleo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:34, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]