Talk:Huron River (disambiguation)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Requested move 25 July 2022[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Result:
Moved per consensus garnered below. Thanks and kudos to editors for your input; good health to all! P.I. Ellsworth , ed. put'r there 17:49, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

disclaimer: this closure is neutral; whether or not there is consensus, only the arguments in the request below are reflected, nothing else.


– The Huron River in Michigan is far and away the WP:PTOPIC from a page views perspective. This will also allow us to avoid the confusion of having Huron River (northern Michigan) and Huron River (Michigan) as articles titles as well. Huron River (Michigan) can be kept as a redirect from move with a {{Redirect}} for Huron River (Michigan) linking to Huron River (northern Michigan) as exists right now. TartarTorte 20:40, 25 July 2022 (UTC) — Relisting. – robertsky (talk) 17:50, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment the two Michigan thing can be fixed with Huron River (southern Michigan) to go with northern Michigan. "Huron River (Michigan)" can then be repointed to the disambiguation page -- 64.229.88.43 (talk) 03:47, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support as proposed. This is clearly the most important Huron River and it doesn't appear to be close. All the other eponymous rivers added together have less than a third of its length. This is the primary topic. Red Slash 22:54, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support – pageviews favor the one in Southeast Michigan by a substantial margin, and I don't see any long-term-significance argument to the contrary. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 17:42, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

One solution[edit]

side 1: 5 4 2 9

side 2: 5 6 8 1

side 3:

1 7 3 9

all sides = 20 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.37.183.227 (talk) 17:02, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]