Talk:Huntington D. Sheldon

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Huntington D. Sheldon. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 04:36, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Huntington D. Sheldon/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

I created the article as a stub; a place where, hopefully, information about this founding CIA figure can be collected--what is here is either quoted from Lehman or derived from Phillips, which isn't much. I came here looking for information on Alice Sheldon's husband, and was astonished to find no entry, so I created this one. Randwolf 03:58, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 03:58, 6 May 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 18:29, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

May 2019: Ridiculous excuse for an article[edit]

That two-thirds of any WP article should consist of a direct quote from one of the article's sources is both lazy and preposterous. Is any editor interested in rewriting the quote (or parts thereof) such that the article achieves narrative flow?--Quisqualis (talk) 18:19, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Richard Kovar reversion[edit]

Because of the last name you can tell we're related, a basic rule meaning that I shouldn't edit it. The article about Mom was easy: I contacted the author, he wouldn't change biostatistician to statistician, I asked if anyone else would do it, it was done. I should have done the same with this but automatically did it as a reversion. I would appreciate someone undoing my change then doing it them self. --Kovar (talk) 03:15, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]