Talk:Human rights in Bolivia

Bolivia Top‑importance

	Bolivia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bolivia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of all Bolivia-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BoliviaWikipedia:WikiProject BoliviaTemplate:WikiProject BoliviaBolivia articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Library of Congress Country Studies

This article contains information from WikiProject Library of Congress Country Studies, an attempt to incorporate useful information, text, and images from the Library of Congress Country Studies and the related Country Profiles. These are public domain documents with extensive information on many countries. You may see what other Bolivia-related contributions have been made by looking at the project's subpage for Bolivia, which tracks progress for articles on Bolivia, and look for what contributions you can make, including updates to this article.Library of Congress Country StudiesWikipedia:WikiProject Library of Congress Country StudiesTemplate:WikiProject Library of Congress Country StudiesLibrary of Congress Country Studies articles

Human rights High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Human rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Human rightsTemplate:WikiProject Human rightsHuman rights articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Human Rights Watch[edit]

I would suggested that the material that has been added, sourced only to Human Rights Watch, that is of a controversial nature have lead-ins indicated that it is the source of HRW reports. I have zero problem with it being reflected. But it is obviously controversial, and being presented with wikipedia's voice. Instead, it should reflect the source of the controversial statements in the text.--Epeefleche (talk) 23:51, 18 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]