Talk:Hughes H-1 Racer

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Given that the replica was given serial number 2, and was in fact considered another production of the original and not a replica, shouldn't the number built be set to two? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.101.75.7 (talk) 01:26, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Which one is the real output?

It was fitted with a Pratt & Whitney R-1535 twin-row 14-cylinder radial engine of 25.2 liters, putting out over 1,000 horsepower (750 kW).

And below:

Powerplant: 1× Pratt & Whitney R-1535[4] radial engine, 700 hp (521 kW)

84.227.139.69 (talk) 19:57, 7 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

On 23 October 1934, Francesco Agello of Italy, set the world speed record for a piston driven airplane of 440.68 with a Macchi MC72.

It may be that the H-1 set a record for a non-seaplane or the United States record. I have not confirmed exactly what record, if any, the H-1 actually set.

You are correct- he set the land-plane speed record. Hughes himself always made sure to make this perfectly clear to interviewing media and such. Surviving transcripts and recordings show him correcting and explaining this issue quite frequently. I have edited the page to specify "land-plane speed record". I also added a small Trivia section with a very obscure fact about the H-1 relating to the color of the wings over time. (By the way, this is the first time I've tried to edit wikipedia. I made a bunch of newbie mistakes. After making my initial edit with the additional information, I corrected a bunch of typos and stuff without marking any of those revisions "minor". I also didn't put anything in the "Edit Summary" for any of my revisions. Oops. I'll do better next time now that I'm aware.)

BTW: Thanks to this discussion I expanded several articles relating to the M.C.72 (a facinating plane). Thanks for the tip!Cglassey 19:20, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:H-1 Racer.jpg[edit]

Image:H-1 Racer.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 17:12, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re-write[edit]

I would like to amend this article to more closely follow the guidelines in the WP:Aviation group. I invite commentary before I begin an extensive edit. FWiW Bzuk (talk) 00:38, 6 March 2009 (UTC).[reply]

It appears that the article was written without access to what I consider the ultimate Hughes reference, Paul Matt's article in Historical Aviation Album. I hope that it will be taken into account when the article is revised.Uu-flyer (talk) 20:47, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
No problem, although no source should really be considered the ultimate resource, please feel free to make those revisions. Remember that a Harvard citation is being used in referencing statements. The form will be: Matt and Rust 1980, p. 12. (just an example). FWiW Bzuk (talk) 21:31, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

First flight[edit]

Is September 13, 1935 the date of the first flight, the date of the record-breaking flight, or both? Drutt (talk) 16:59, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Name:- Racer? or Special[edit]

With a l.ittle digging the correct name for this articla can be found. Is it Hughes H-1 Racer or Hughes H-1 Special. I incline toward the latter, as i think the racer epithet was added to Hughes H-1 just to describe its function. Any discussion?Petebutt (talk) 03:59, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Officially, it was the Hughes H.1 but the tag "racer" or "Racer" began to be used unofficially nearly from its genesis. The modified "H-1B Special" was the only use of the different name. The Smithsonian refers to the aircraft as the "Hughes H-1 Racer." FWiW Bzuk (talk) 11:43, 24 April 2010 (UTC).[reply]

According to Paul Matt, Hughes himself always referred to the plane as the Hughes 1B and the "H-1" designation was invented by the comtemporary media.Uu-flyer (talk) 20:47, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong Registration?[edit]

In the infobox, the Registration given is NR258Y, but the pictures in the article show it to be NX258Y. Is this just a typo or it has some reason behind? — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheDestroyer111 (talkcontribs) 11:50, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

NX258Y is the registration of the replica built by Jim Wright. (http://offbeatoregon.com/1207sp-heroic-final-flight-of-jim-wright-howard-hughes-racer-plane.html) Both NR258Y and NX258Y are seen on different photos of Hughes' plane, and at least one photo has both NR and NX on the plane at the same time (https://www.thisdayinaviation.com/tag/transcontinental-speed-record/), though it is R258Y as currently displayed at the Smithsonian. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stoic Correction (talkcontribs) 05:35, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hughes H-1 Racer. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:38, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hughes H-1 Racer. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:52, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

YouTuber inclusion and relevance[edit]

Drachinifel is a decent YouTuber and somewhat accomplished with his channel on Naval History, but is his opinion really relevant and notable enough for inclusion into this article? He is by no means an historian or aviation expert. 107.77.207.77 (talk) 21:36, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]