Talk:Hugh McElhenny

Hugh McElhenny has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Hugh McElhenny is part of the Million Dollar Backfield (San Francisco 49ers) series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
December 4, 2016	Good article nominee	Listed
December 15, 2017	Good topic candidate	Promoted

A news item involving this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "In the news" column on June 24, 2022.

Current status: Good article

Biography: Sports and Games

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	Sports portal This article is supported by the sports and games work group (assessed as Mid-importance).

College football High‑importance

	College football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject College football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of college football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.College footballWikipedia:WikiProject College footballTemplate:WikiProject College footballcollege football articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

National Football League Top‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Football League, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the NFL on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Football LeagueWikipedia:WikiProject National Football LeagueTemplate:WikiProject National Football LeagueNational Football League articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

San Francisco 49ers High‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject San Francisco 49ers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the San Francisco 49ers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.San Francisco 49ersWikipedia:WikiProject San Francisco 49ersTemplate:WikiProject San Francisco 49ersSan Francisco 49ers articles

High

This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject San Francisco 49ers To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Assess : Tag appropriate talk pages with {{WikiProject San Francisco 49ers}} and update the classification of articles in Category:Unassessed San Francisco 49ers articles and Category:Unknown-importance San Francisco 49ers articles.
Photo : Update photo of starting quarterback Brock Purdy showing him in 49er gear for his article and inclusion on this page. (Requires photo upload and link to Wikimedia Commons.)
Other : Expand active membership.
- Bring San Francisco 49ers to a Good article.
- Update articles on current 49er personnel.

California: Los Angeles Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Greater Los Angeles portal This article is supported by Los Angeles area task force.

Of possible use for expanding this[edit]

David Eskenazi, Wayback Machine: Hugh McElhenny & the Kings, Sportspress Northwest, March 22, 2011.

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Hugh McElhenny/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: BlackJack (talk · contribs) 12:04, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Starting review[edit]

I'll do this one. Will start soon. Jack | ^{talk page} 12:04, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@BlackJack: I think it'd be best to start with this one, if you will. Of the three it's the one I feel most satisfied with. Lizard (talk) 04:44, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Lizard the Wizard: Okay, I'll do McElhenny next, before Johnson. I've done Perry subject to one citation. Sorry, I've been short of time in the last week or so but I will get to them all. Thanks again. Jack | ^{talk page} 09:34, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Full review criteria checks[edit]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for the six good article criteria:

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose is clear and concise, without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:

B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and embedded lists: see below
Is it factually accurate and verifiable with no original research?
A. Has an appropriate reference section:

B. Inline citations to reliable sources where necessary (e.g., direct quotations):

C. No original research:

D. No copyright violations:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Scope:

B. Length:
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:

B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:

The main part of the article is fine but I believe some work needs to be done on the introduction. With reference to WP:LEAD, it should really be "three to four paragraphs" (given that the article is 30k-plus) and I think it isn't quite a fully concise summary of the narrative. I'll leave it with you as you know the subject and I don't. Please let me know when you've had chance to consider. Placing "on hold" for now. Good work overall, though, and a very interesting article. He must have been quite a player. All the best. Jack | ^{talk page} 12:52, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@BlackJack: I think it should suffice now. Lizard (talk) 20:06, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Lizard the Wizard: Sorry, I read the article again first thing this morning but had to go out and then forgot all about it! It's very good now and I am completely satisfied. Excellent work which deservedly rates GA. Well done. I'll look at John Henry Johnson in a few days, if that's okay. Jack | ^{talk page} 13:24, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

1952 NFL Rookie of the Year[edit]

He currently isn't displayed on National Football League Rookie of the Year Award. Facts don't seem to be in dispute, but I couldn't tie this to a selector (UPI, Sporting News, etc). Potential supporting cites:

http://sportspressnw.com/2196330/2015/wayback-machine-star-of-years-best-alums
http://www.psacard.com/cardfacts/football-cards/1962-topps/hugh-mcelhenny-92/7993
http://articles.latimes.com/1985-01-20/sports/sp-10560_1_hugh-mcelhenny (also has a neat Super Bowl coin toss story with Pres Reagan)

Some have referred to it as a unanimous selection, but that article doesn't have 1952 support at the moment. UW Dawgs (talk) 18:43, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I just asked Cbl62 if he could find anything. I was always under the impression that the UPI and Sporting News were the first to give ROTY awards, in 1955. Lizard (talk) 18:49, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Also, trading cards are usually terrible sources. For example, McElhenny and Perry never played together at Compton University. That's a misconception that was also in Perry's article. Lizard (talk) 18:58, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed, included as directional support for the general research issue. UW Dawgs (talk) 19:03, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Date of Death[edit]

He died on June 17th according to ESPN — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.122.216.158 (talk) 19:56, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]