Talk:Hovnanian Enterprises

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Comments[edit]

It seems like this article was written (or heavily edited) by a company PR person.

If the company has received complaints, there should be examples and links so that the reader can assess their value, rather than the article assuring the reader that complaints are inevitable, and so should be ignored.

Also, referring to residential structures as "homes" is salesmanship, and is not appropriate for an article purporting to be authoritative.

Lazytory 16:42, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. Before even seeing the tag, the complaint section seems very Pro-Hovnanian. Angrymansr 18:48, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Removed more POV --VartanM 19:18, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I removed the tag. It looks pretty neutral now. Angrymansr 03:14, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Complaints section is being edited by the owner of not-khov.com John Eric Pearce aka EPearce, if we are allowing disgruntled customers to promote their personal websites are we going to allow a company PR person to maintain positive reviews and testimonials? This is hardly the purpose here correct? Last I checked wikipedia is not a forum for disgruntled consumers on a personal crusade.
So remove what he added instead of the whole freaking section. Angrymansr 16:00, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The reference links are all out of date.

Copyright problem removed[edit]

One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s). The material was copied from this URL: http://www.reuters.com/finance/stocks/companyProfile?symbol=HOV.N. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a license compatible with GFDL. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 01:06, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hovnanian Enterprises. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:08, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]