Talk:House of Air

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the House of Air article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

California: San Francisco Bay Area Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	San Francisco Bay Area portal This article is supported by San Francisco Bay Area task force (assessed as Low-importance).

I currently work at house of air, and a lot of the information on this page is outdated. I understand wikipedia has a rule against original research, but is there any way I can contribute to updating this page?50.200.9.226 (talk) 20:26, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Controversy section[edit]

I think it is obvious that there are some dangers in a venue of this nature and that creating an entire section about "controversy" gives undue influence to a minority viewpoint. The cited article says that there is "An element of danger, but oh what fun," without any mention of "Controversy." Any issue with deleting it? Nemo9669 (talk) 19:40, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Its up to you, I think having a whole section on controversy is a bit too much. Maybe moving the complaints and injury reports to the intro? Marlith (Talk) 19:55, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I was looking to flesh this out more anyway and would reference the inherent risk and injury in what is potentially an extremeish sport-- especially given the innocuous nature of it and the biggest risk being that people dismiss it because it's "only trampolines." Thanks. Nemo9669 (talk) 20:54, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]