This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hotels, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to the hospitality industry, including hotels, motels, resorts, and destination spas on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HotelsWikipedia:WikiProject HotelsTemplate:WikiProject HotelsHotels articles
This article falls under the scope of WikiProject Paranormal, which aims to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to the paranormal and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the attached article, help with current tasks, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and discussions.ParanormalWikipedia:WikiProject ParanormalTemplate:WikiProject Paranormalparanormal articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
There appears to be two articles here for the same building. I propose we merge the two together. See Hotel San Carlos (Phoenix, Arizona) for more information. Thanks. Cygnusloop99 (talk) 23:20, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hey, good catch. No need for a big discussion, of course they should be merged. Merging.... In the process, I am restoring the NRHP name for the hotel in the NRHP infobox (in order to show this is the article covering the place having the NRHP name).
Also, in the merge, i am putting the NRHP infobox below the existing Hotel infobox. It would probably be good to make a combined infobox. In some other areas, like for lighthouses or ships that have their own infobox types, the NRHP infobox is sometimes/often stripped down and embedded within the other infobox. That requires some attention. There's some info at the Talk/Help pages for the NRHP infobox, if someone wants to take that on. However, here maybe the hotel infobox should be dropped in favor of just showing the NRHP infobox. --doncram (talk) 18:16, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Awesome, I didn't think it needed much of a discussion but im new and this was my first merge. I was just trying to follow some of the merge help guide info I read. Thanks for the help and support. Cygnusloop99 (talk) 02:41, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, good. It is definitely good to use the merge proposal mechanism if there is any possibility of contention. One thing that matters sometimes is which gets merged into which; I prefer for the newer article to get merged into the older one, losing the edit history in the newer one rather than the longer history. I guess i felt empowered to just go ahead with the merge, because it was me who had created the article being merged away. You're doing great! :) --doncram (talk) 03:52, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
.png){kind=small}
