Talk:Hot Wheels: AcceleRacers

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Fair use rationale for Image:AcceleRacers Breaking Point.jpg[edit]

Image:AcceleRacers Breaking Point.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 05:47, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:AcceleRacers Ignition.jpg[edit]

Image:AcceleRacers Ignition.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 05:48, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Reversion request[edit]

Back to this edit. Rationale: Every edit afterwards is either original research, fanfiction, or grammar correction of the original research and fanfiction. OnikageWolf (talk) 21:38, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Poorly written[edit]

No offense, but the trivia section looks like a 7 year old wrote it, could someone fix this? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.227.219.78 (talk) 01:59, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Version[edit]

Is Hot Wheels World Race/Acceleracers a prime version? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.89.156.49 (talk) 23:32, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Recent major changes[edit]

Someone has essentially deleted the entire page. I think we need to discuss this... Zcbtkn (talk) 18:04, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the recent additions per WP:INDISCRIMINATE; The sheer amount of information added was extreme, with none of it sourced. Eik Corell (talk) 19:06, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

That may be, but there has to be a better way to handle the situation than to just wipe everything. -76.104.164.59 (talk) 12:07, 27 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A complete rewrite and shortening of the usable parts like the plot sections, but unless sources are provided that wouldn't really be any good either; This article is already tagged as being low on citing sources, what it needs isn't a boatload of trivia and a plot section far above 700 words. To put things into perspective, the added plot section [here] close to 6000 characters, and the 400-700 limit mentioned is for feature films. Given that this is basically a minor action series where the plot isn't all that sophisticated or even important, the length and scope of the added plot section is not appropriate, same with the added character and location trivia. Eik Corell (talk) 12:31, 27 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I propose that external links should be used, to direct those looking for an in depth discussion and trivia, to various fan wikis. Zcbtkn (talk) 21:55, 9 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Eik, I apologize for insinuating an edit war, and attacking your changes instead of discussing them. Please forgive me for my actions. Zcbtkn (talk) 22:02, 9 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Cast, I think we should keep the cast on the page. It's very important.

Cast[edit]

Nosecone33 (talk) 03:53, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Some suggested additions and edits
115.244.45.193 (talk) 08:54, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]