Talk:Horsengoggle

Opening heading

I have been using horse n' goggle as a selection method ever since I learned it back in 1977 at Camp Nebagamon. I was amazed that no one had created an article about it, since it is well known among people going to camp in Wisconsin and other youth organizations. It truly is the best selection method when you have a group larger than three people. I am hoping that more people will find out about it and start using it.Eviltrouts (talk) 06:02, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

I understand the need to keep Wikipedia's articles free from abuse, but I was under the impression that one aspect of Wikipedia was to be a cultural encyclopedia -- to document factual information that has been left out of the current powers-that-be in publishing. I have tried to include documentation to prove the existence of horse n' goggle as a selection method, and its adoption by many groups and individuals. When I went looking for some online references to it, I was disappointed that there were so few explanations of how to play. It seems to be one of those games that people use but it only currently only survived by oral tradition. I noticed that there were other people who had referred to it online and were also disappointed that it wasn't in wikipedia yet.

I certainly hope that the Wikipedia powers find this argument valid enough to allow the inclusion of this article. It would be a shame to deny the existence of this game, even though it has been used for generations. Eviltrouts (talk) 21:40, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

@Eviltrouts: To "document factual information that has been left out of the current powers-that-be in publishing" is sadly pretty much the opposite of Wikipedia's purpose. One of the project's core policies is WP:VERIFY, which requires that all content be "determined by previously published information rather than the beliefs or experiences of its editors" - we're here to research and present what other researchers have already written about horsengoggle, rather than to offer our own first-hand memories and findings (which could be inaccurate, or biased, or misrepresented, or hoaxes, with no way of checking). --McGeddon (talk) 19:06, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 03:06, 22 November 2011 (UTC)

---

Horse n' goggle → Horsengoggle – The more reliable sources appear to use this as a spelling. "N'" is an incorrect abbreviation of "and". McGeddon (talk) 09:47, 15 November 2011 (UTC)

Usage looks strongly split to me. I guess the proposal has the advantage of not needing to decide how to punctuate it. Powers ^T 20:11, 15 November 2011 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Horsengoggle. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110522092650/http://www.mudcat.org/thread.cfm?threadid=47148&messages=101&page=1&desc=yes to http://www.mudcat.org/thread.cfm?threadid=47148&messages=101&page=1&desc=yes

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:53, 5 April 2017 (UTC)