Talk:Horse blanket

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

U.S. currency nicknamed "horse blankets"[edit]

I added a hatnote to this article:

For larger U.S. dollar notes prior to 1929, see History of the United States dollar.

The entry "horse blanket" on Wiktionary states:

(obsolete, slang) currency in the 1800s consisting of large size notes/bills.

At the time I made the edit, the article History of the United States dollar stated:

In 1929, sizing of the bills was standardized (involving a 25% reduction in their current sizes).

Cgoodwin (talk · contribs) reverted, with an edit summary "spam".

So I edited the article History of the United States dollar to clarify the connection between the two meanings of the term, using as a citation a print source from the Wiktionary entry:

In 1929, sizing of the bills was standardized (involving a 25% reduction in their current sizes, compared to the older, larger notes nicknamed "horse blankets"[9]).

Would the hatnote still be considered spam now? Or would I need multiple citations for one word in the other article in order to justify the hatnote? --Damian Yerrick (talk | stalk) 00:00, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think the revert may have caught your hatnote with some external link spam by accident. Possibly a simple dab page would work too. But if you want to just add one hatnote, keep it as short as possible: something like {{for|slang term for large pre-1929 US Dollar bills|History of the United States dollar}} There's an ongoing debate over what hatnotes are best for wiki, and that's a debate I try to avoid as much as I can. Montanabw(talk) 02:12, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done after over a week of no replies. I tend to start a disambiguation page once a third alternate meaning shows up, but right now, there are just two (saddle blanket and old US currency). --Damian Yerrick (talk | stalk) 00:07, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I think there's enough heartburn over this to just start the dab page now, so I did. Montanabw(talk) 05:20, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Horse blanket. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:33, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Medieval Knights' horses[edit]

Horses belonging to Knights in Medieval times were fitted with blankets of a sort. What I gather from looking at pictures, there were two types of these "blankets", ceremonial and protective for battle.

I could find no description of these blankets anywhere on the internet including Wikipedia. The only references I could find is pictures. So, I pose the question: Is this article the appropriate place for someone of knowledge on the subject to post HISTORICAL coverings for horses? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lesiz (talkcontribs) 20:15, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]