Talk:Hormizd III

Hormizd III has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: May 6, 2019. (Reviewed version).

Iran Low‑importance

	Iran portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Iran, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles related to Iran on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please join the project where you can contribute to the discussions and help with our open tasks.IranWikipedia:WikiProject IranTemplate:WikiProject IranIran articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Biography: Royalty and Nobility

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Royalty and Nobility.

Greece: Byzantine Low‑importance

	Greece portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greece, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greece on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GreeceWikipedia:WikiProject GreeceTemplate:WikiProject GreeceGreek articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Byzantine world task force.

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Hormizd III/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Gog the Mild (talk · contribs) 17:20, 6 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have made a couple of minor copy edits.
Daryaee is not used as a source. Should he be under 'See also'?
"who is called unfair". I have no idea what this means. Would it be possible to rephrase?
"this is most likely a legend, and is disproved by other sources" If it is "disproved" then it is definitely a legend. You need to reword here. (Maybe "disproved" -> 'contradicted'?)

Gog the Mild (talk) 17:20, 6 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Changed unfair -> unjust. I've also added Daryaee as a source and changed disproved -> contradicted. --HistoryofIran (talk) 17:34, 6 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

That all looks good to me. A fine little article. Gog the Mild (talk) 17:54, 6 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()

3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()

Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed