Talk:Hong Kong Club Building

GA assessment

I’ve placed the article on hold for a second opinion to address the following:

This is a peculiar article in that it is attempting to address three entirely different structures whose only commonality is the (principle) tenant. The page title and infobox, therefore, are somewhat misleading. I’m concerned that the only structure of true notability is the “second generation”. The “third generation,” which is implicitly the focus, doesn’t appear particularly notable (i.e. not tallest in a certain area, not unique architecture/construction, etc.); a notable tenant does not make a notable structure. Frankly, I think the article should be restructured to focus on the “second generation”; the “first generation” information would then be appropriate for background and the “third,” obviously, as the replacement. Thoughts? Ɛƚƈơƅƅơƚɑ _talk 03:33, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

I'm failing the article. There has been no response, and there are major issues as noted above. Also, remember you need punctuation before you place a ref, and you need to wikilink dates. — Dihydrogen Monoxide 22:51, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

• I believe the only requirement about the refs wrt punctuation is consistency. The linking of dates is now deprecated. Ohconfucius (talk) 10:36, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

GA Reassessment

This discussion is transcluded from Talk:Hong Kong Club Building (1897)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.

Principal editor requesting reassessment. I believe work has now been done to address the initial concerns, and the article has been moved to an appropriate namespace. Ohconfucius (talk) 09:47, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

I'm going to remove the GAR tag from this talk page. Nobody has responded to it and it was initiated almost eight months ago. Also, I think the GAR was incorrectly initiated - they are only used to review articles that are listed as GA, to determine if they actually meet GA criteria, and not to re-assess failed GANs. Hong Qi Gong (Talk - Contribs) 14:39, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hong Kong Club Building. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150527061132/http://www.thestandard.com.hk/news_detail.asp?pp_cat=&art_id=26618&sid=&con_type=1&d_str=19970213&sear_year=1997 to http://www.thestandard.com.hk/news_detail.asp?pp_cat=&art_id=26618&sid=&con_type=1&d_str=19970213&sear_year=1997

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:29, 6 November 2017 (UTC)