Talk:Hollis Frampton

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers.

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

NPOV[edit]

Bulk of this article (aside from filmography) contains biased statements; viz. 'noted erudition,' 'most well known,' etc. which is why I added the tag. Will try to clean up in subsequent edits.

I don't think there are that many biased statements in the article. You wrote "the bulk of the article" contains them. Can you point out more? Also, how to correct the two that you have mentioned? He was noted for his erudition (I have now added some references to back that up) and "Nostalgia" is the most well-known film of that series. I am not the original author of this piece but I am going to work on it because Frampton was a great artist and deserves a well done and accurate page without any disputes. Markal 03:12, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Stuff like "It is an amazing 45 minutes of film" is gratuitous, not helpful description. Tell us WHY Frampton was such a great filmmaker, WHY this films are so interesting.

Refs[edit]

No refs whatsoever. 'Nuff said. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Merryjman (talk • contribs) 01:56, August 22, 2007 (UTC).

I have started adding references. Although the HF page has no references, the content appears to me to be factually accurate.Markal 14:13, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The first paragraph now has references to substantiate the factual claims made therein. I have limited time to devote to cleaning up this article but I am going to do my best as I find time.Markal 03:14, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The NPOV tag should be removed. This is gratuitious. steven (talk) 22:31, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hollis Frampton. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140214123721/http://www.buffalo.edu/ubreporter/working/obituaries.host.html/content/shared/university/news/ub-reporter-articles/briefs/2014/obit_faller.detail.html to http://www.buffalo.edu/ubreporter/working/obituaries.host.html/content/shared/university/news/ub-reporter-articles/briefs/2014/obit_faller.detail.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:07, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]