Talk:Hokkaido Chuo Bus

Japan Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 01:46, May 16, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Japan to do list:

Peer review: Kako River (Japan)
A-class review: None

Featured content candidates –

Articles: None
Pictures: None
Lists: None

Good article nominations: Pure Japanese, Vinland Saga (TV series), Japanese destroyer Ume (1944), Mai Fujisawa, Godzilla Minus One
Add requested images to articles that need them.
Pages for Deletion: Participate in Japan-related deletion discussions.
Improve and expand Japan-related stubs.
Create some requested articles.
Help translate an article from the Japanese Wikipedia into English.
Assess unassessed articles

"Highway bus"[edit]

Is the Japanese term "Highway bus" really appropriate here when "long-distance bus" is the more widely used and understood term in English? --DAJF (talk) 04:51, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Of course it is. If you look at the english version of the japanese bus companies they are always called Highway bus, if you look at the japan-guide website (the most known english language web for information about japan), they are also called Highway bus. If not, you should change the name shinkansen for that kind of train service, too, because in USA they are called...high-speed trains?? I don't know how you call them, but the point is clear I think.

And another thing, you could, sometimes improve some articles by adding new information, not always saying this is wrong, that should be like that..., this article doesn't have inline references, etc., if you found something wrong or without inline references, guess what, you can do them yourself. Of course is OK when you correct something like misspelling or redacting errors; but wikipedia need more people who bring something new, investigate, adding new information, not just the REALLY EASY posture of just saying what is wrong, but not doing anything to improve it. ともだち (talk) 19:35, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]