Talk:Hobo (typeface)

Reasons why[edit]

See

Well, related to typography, there are several articles and images missing. You can see all the red links in List of fonts, and blank spaces (where there should be an image) in Samples of serif typefaces or Samples of display typefaces or Samples of script typefaces, etc... The goal of the collaboration is to upgrade and improve all those things. If you go to the collaboration page, you will find further information and open tasks as well as instructions about all this. That´s basically all. This is a personal request for help in a task here in wikipedia. If you´re interested in collaborate, go ahead! - ☩Damërung ☩. -- 20:42, 18 October 2009 (UTC)

then click on the link here

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_fonts

then look up Hobo (font)

I only followed instructions to try to create articles with red links. Just because Hobo is a funny name does not mean deletion. Hi Balloon Boy (talk) 21:04, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Name[edit]

The list you pointed at linked Hobo to Hobo (font), although Hobo (disambiguation) and the page about the man who designed it point to Hobo (typeface). Which title is better suited? Furthermore the list mostly uses (typeface) in stead of (font). Jarkeld (talk) 21:23, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have moved the article to "typeface" as that is the consistent term used to dab. (There is also a (redundant) difference between the two words.) --rannṗáirtí anaiṫnid (coṁrá) 21:36, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]