Talk:History of the flags of Romania/GA1

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
I believe that this article has enough material to become a Good Srticle. It was a DYK and is over 85,407 bytes. It'll make a great GA nominee. Secret Saturdays (talk) 00:07, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): a (MoS):

It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
My conceran it that it has too many images as maybe it is possibly i have seen some GAs with gallerys but i recomend that you take the non neasecery images.
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

I will let seven days to improve the artical. --Pedro J. ^{the rookie} 00:52, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please be more specific with your concerns. It is difficult to improve things if you are too vague about them. ···日本穣^? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe 04:22, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your concern about too many images, I don't think this is the case here. The article is about the various flags of ROmania, which is necessarily a visual topic. Therefore, anyone reading the article would expect to see a large number and wide variety of examples of the various flags used throughout Romania's history. I don't think the article is overwhelmed with the images. ···日本穣^? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe 04:27, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Point takean.--Pedro J. ^{the rookie} 00:06, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Overall: Pass. --Pedro J. ^{the rookie} 00:08, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Intro[edit]

Can someone bulk-up the intro? It should be at least twice the present size as a GA. Nergaal (talk) 22:39, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]