Talk:History of the Constitution of the Roman Republic

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleHistory of the Constitution of the Roman Republic has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
September 26, 2008Good article nomineeListed
January 2, 2009Good topic candidatePromoted
May 16, 2020Good topic removal candidateDemoted
Current status: Good article

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:History of the Constitution of the Roman Republic/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
  • References needed:
    • "In the immediate aftermath of the revolution, the senate and the assemblies were as powerless as they had been under the monarchy."
    • "During the fourth century BC..."
    • "It was, in all likelihood, simply a matter of time before the Plebeians came to dominate the senate."
    • "The senators, in contrast, were usually quite experienced..."
    • "Soon the masses of unemployed Plebeians began to flood into Rome, and into the ranks of the legislative assemblies."
    • "The prior era saw great military successes,..."
    • "Sulla soon made peace with Mithridates..."
    • "that the senate decided to override him..."
    • "On January 7 of 49 BC, the senate ..."
    • "After Caesar's assassination, Mark Antony..."
  • Collapse both navigation boxes

Gary King (talk) 05:56, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have made these changes. Please update the GA nomination. RomanHistorian (talk) 06:14, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • The images take up more than 50% of the width on 1024x768 screens. Consider shrinking them.
  • Use en dashes for numerical ranges such as "103-23" and in the section titles
I do not think it is a numerical range, but rather a chapter-article or something like that. Nergaal (talk) 01:36, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Well, I mean two numbers and a line between them. Gary King (talk) 03:44, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
How do you do those dashes? I am not sure how. I am also not sure what needs these dashes. RomanHistorian (talk) 03:53, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
It's all at WP:DASH :) Gary King (talk) 03:57, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
What needs these dashes? RomanHistorian (talk) 05:16, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Gary King (talk) 21:41, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have made these changes. Will anything else need to be done for GA status? RomanHistorian (talk) 00:22, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I second to the question. Nergaal (talk) 02:06, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
En dashes still aren't done, such as in section titles. I haven't checked the rest. Gary King (talk) 03:44, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, missed on the part with the titles-done. Nergaal (talk) 05:35, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • "Abbott, 42-43" → "Abbott, 42–43"
  • "Plebeian Council,.[50] " → "Plebeian Council.[50] "
  • "Document 103-23" → "Document 103–23"
  • "Law. 1871-1888" → "Law. 1871–1888"
  • references needed for the following, to the end of the paragraphs
    • "It was a modification to the Valerian law"
    • "and great economic failures,"
    • "Sulla and his supporters then slaughtered most of Marius' supporters"
    • "and rescind the land laws that Caesar had passed in 59 BC for Pompey's veterans."
    • "the senate passed a senatus consultum ultimum,"
    • "They held powers that were nearly identical to the powers that Caesar had held under his "

Gary King (talk) 14:23, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have added the references, and I addressed the issues above. For the dashes, I simply replaced the three dashes in question with "& ndash;" (without the space). Is this what you were referring to? RomanHistorian (talk) 22:09, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah that's fine Gary King (talk) 22:11, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Could you add more links to the article? Some paragraphs are completely devoid of links completely. Gary King (talk) 22:12, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Do you mean wikilinks? RomanHistorian (talk) 01:10, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Yep. Surely there are some terms in those paragraphs that are interesting and useful enough to be linked, so readers who want to learn more about them can click on them. Gary King (talk) 02:50, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I have made these changes. RomanHistorian (talk) 06:33, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
added a bunch. Not sure weather it is still enough. Nergaal (talk) 06:44, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

bumpiest bump! Nergaal (talk) 18:25, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Passing Gary King (talk) 18:54, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Improvements needed here (senatus consultum ultimum & Gaius Gracchus)[edit]

The section on Gaius Gracchus needs work.

In the past, the senate eliminated political rivals either by establishing special judicial commissions or by passing a senatus consultum ultimum ("ultimate decree of the senate).[46][59] Both devices allowed the senate to bypass the ordinary due process rights that all citizens had.[60] Gaius outlawed the judicial commissions, and declared the senatus consultum ultimum to be unconstitutional.

The first senatus consultum ultimum was used on Gaius Gracchus so it's not possible that he found it unconstitutional, or that it was used in the past. From memory a trial of Gaius Rabirius (pro Rabirio perduellionis) whereby he was tried for the killing of Saturninus during a senatus consultum ultimum was the first attack on the constitutionality of the senatus consultum ultimum.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on History of the Constitution of the Roman Republic. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:34, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:History_of_the_Constitution_of_the_Roman_Republic&oldid=1202733885"