Talk:History of Zagreb

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

History

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Croatia: Zagreb Mid‑importance

	Croatia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Croatia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Croatia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CroatiaWikipedia:WikiProject CroatiaTemplate:WikiProject CroatiaCroatia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Zagreb task force.

Untitled[edit]

"It would be much easier, therefore, to take a short walk and look at Zagreb's history." this doesn't strike me as proper formating for a wiki article... but its not a big error, and the article seems well written in the formats it was written in(the citations don't look like enough thourough enough though). just thought i'd put the idea out there.--193.235.215.105 16:52, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Historical periods[edit]

I agree that the article is more "popular scientific" in its tone, but my main concern is that it doesn't follow the good practice of being divided into the actual historical periods. I'm not a historian myself, but it should really mention the Roman period (the town of Andautonia was on the edge of modern city area), detailed history of the medieval times etc. — Preceding unsigned comment added by BerislavLopac (talk • contribs) 07:58, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I concur that separating (especially the Old Zagreb) into more specific periods would be helpful.RedJaguar05 (talk) 20:03, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

History of Architecture in Zagreb[edit]

Just talk about the different styles and buildings and says nothing about its history! For example: Who controlled the city in WWII? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.230.13.12 (talk) 14:48, 17 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed that the architecture is thoroughly covered. This article is light on historical events in the City. More research is needed, but I don't think what we have needs to be removed.RedJaguar05 (talk) 20:03, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]