Talk:Higher-Order Perl

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled section[edit]

Does anyone know whether HOP will ever actually be made available online? The page saying that it'll be coming eventually was last updated in 2005, and the sign-up for the hop-volunteer mailing list doesn't work for me. JadeNB (talk) 16:50, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I´m wondering the same thing. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.146.102.47 (talk) 15:20, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It is now available. I have updated the main page with a link. JadeNB (talk) 21:43, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest[edit]

I would like to dispute the "conflict of interest" tag that was recently added. I am well aware of the potential for a conflict of interest here, and I have tried to take care not to make any objectionable changes. A look at my changes to this article will reveal that I am not a "major contributor" to the article. My changes were all extremely minor and, I think, inarguable. For example, I corrected the spelling of the title of the book and I linked some of the items in the chapter listing to the relevant Wikipedia articles. Aside from adding an infobox, I made only one significant change: I removed a link to my web site that did not seem relevant; I think this should demonstrate my good faith. —Mark Dominus (talk) 14:06, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notability[edit]

A user recently added a template that asserts that this subject may not be notable under the General Notability Guidelines. Whether or not that is true, I believe it is the wrong standard to use. The correct standard is the specific guideline for notability of books. —Mark Dominus (talk) 14:13, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Self Promoting Advertisement[edit]

This article is about a non-notable book and a non-notable author and is presented as a book advertisement. All of its sources are self-published with an interesting slight of hand by funneling them through advertisement programs from linux open source publications but it doesn;t pass the smell test. The Advertisement in China is a great example of this. Would recommend this article for better sources, and absent that, Afd. It's clearly a puffery piece. 166.70.60.63 (talk) 04:43, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]