Talk:HiPac

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Thank you Techmoan, for being the impetus behind this page.

Capitalization?[edit]

So, is it HIPAC, Hipac, HiPac, or what? Page name is "Hipac", article uses "HIPAC", Google seems to like "HiPac". Pick one! --A D Monroe III (talk) 00:16, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pretty Sure HiPac is correct. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.172.80.156 (talk) 18:19, 29 September 2017‎ (UTC)[reply]

I did not lookup for exact spelling, maybe some confused with the upcase logo. --Hans Haase (有问题吗) 11:53, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
If no one else has a proposal to fix this, I'll convert article and title to "HiPac". --A D Monroe III (talk) 15:33, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Done. --Hans Haase (有问题吗) 13:19, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The name used in the article text still doesn't match the article title. --A D Monroe III(talk) 15:57, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Image[edit]

So.. basic google search on "Hipac by pioneer" does gives the images for HiPac Sadly all of them are not in good condition and they cant be uploaded to Wikipedia based on its policy, Does anyone else have a HiPac ?, Or ask Techmoan for permission for images ?. Sorry if this is a bit strange im still new at editing. ~ RyoumiyaHaru (talk) 16:37, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. I asked him for pictures on the YouTube comments. Maybe he'll respond, maybe not. Would love original pictures to get around any other issues. Justabaldguy (talk) 02:26, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

YouTube citations[edit]

Just a reminder that YouTube videos are not reliable sources for Wikipedia. Techmoan's video cannot be used as the only citation for a fact; however, you could potentially include it as a secondary supporting source. So I am going to remove the second with the price and model numbers, as that information comes entirely from Techmoan's video and he does not state where he got that info from. For trying to find reliable sources, checking things like trade magazines might be a good start. MrAureliusRTalk! 02:29, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I went ahead and fixed the cite formats for the Billboard magazine references that were already there. I re-wrote a few parts that were badly written, and removed the info that came only from Techmoan's video. There is more info in those citations, but how much of it is relevant enough to include in this article is debatable. MrAureliusRTalk! 03:03, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]