This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Home Living, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of home-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Home LivingWikipedia:WikiProject Home LivingTemplate:WikiProject Home Livinghome articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
The article has been tagged as relying too much on primary sources. I'm not sure that this is appropriate, as there seem to be a good number of reliable non-primary references. While there are many references to Numatic's Web site, they mostly support mention of individual models; general information on the cleaner and the company is, I think, well-referenced. I won't myself remove the tag as others may disagree, but depending on other comments perhaps it should go. Best wishes, Pol098 (talk) 15:50, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I'd support this, the article need a fair bit more work but I think most key points in the lead and history section are now supported by decent enough independent references. LittleDwangs (talk) 16:08, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
