Talk:Heinz Heuer

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the military biography work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Military history: Biography / European / German B‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

B

This article has been rated as B-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military biography task force
	European military history task force
	German military history task force

Germany Low‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Third opinion[edit]

I would like to request a Wikipedia:Third opinion on this revert, as two sources state that no documentation can be found on the Oak Leaves. Would that work? K.e.coffman (talk) 01:00, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I can't stop you, but I don't think it is necessary, as there are a number of Knight's Cross recipients from the end of the war where the documentation isn't in the Bundesarchiv for a number of possible reasons. They are documented in a number of other ways. In this case, the chief of the personnel office of the Order Police testified regarding this award and the presentation is documented in the history of the 4th SS Polizei Panzergrenadier Division Volume 2, according to Von Seemen. Of course, if you have a reliable source that questions the validity of the testimony or the documentation of the award in the divisional history, I would re-consider my position. Also, without looking at the original of the letter that Fellgiebel wrote to Heuer, my assumption is that the comment "evidently dubious, to put it mildly" refers to the views of Scherzer on the validity of the award, not Fellgiebel's position or that of the AKCR on it. The fact that all three sources (Fellgiebel, Scherzer and Von Seemen) all list Heuer as a recipient (albeit with apparent reservations in Scherzer's case), is sufficient in my view. His notability is not dependent on the mere award of the Knight's Cross, it is the combination with being the only member of the Feldgendarmerie awarded it. I also believe he meets the GNG based on the sources used in the article. Cheers, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 01:57, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]