Talk:Hedonic hunger/GA1
GA Review[edit]
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Gug01 (talk · contribs)
Obvious/major mistakes/errors[edit]
There are no large mistakes/errors. There are no {{POW}} or {{unreferenced}} tags, etc.
References[edit]
There is a sufficient number of references and they are reliable sources.
Spelling, grammar, punctuation and capitalization[edit]
This article is well-written and does not contain any spelling, grammar, punctuation or capitalization issues.
Article content: plagiarism, content/comprehensiveness and image use policies[edit]
There is no plagiarism and the images are correctly licensed. The content broadly covers the subject but doesn't go into great detail except where needed.
Stability and point of view[edit]
This article is very stable, with no edit wars in all of its history, and is written from a neutral point of view. Gug01 (talk) 21:22, 1 January 2015 (UTC) Gug 01
Overview in all[edit]
This article is stable, well-referenced, and in general perfect to be a good article. The lead is very short and summarizing, and the article is informative, accessible, of a reasonable length and understandable to everybody. Gug01 (talk) 21:22, 1 January 2015 (UTC) Gug 01