Talk:Heather Scott

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Heather Scott. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:14, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Perjorative tone of several sections in this article[edit]

Several of these are commentary and represent the author's point of view or personal analysis. Wiki should maintain a neutral point of view and these articles break the formal tone like that found in an encyclopedia. These pages are not mean to be gossip pages but if these kinds of negative articles are going to be used then others should be provided to maintain balance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by PoppyKat (talkcontribs) 22:07, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Also, much of this biographical material is entirely negative and the information is slanted towards one point of view. There should be some balance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by PoppyKat (talkcontribs) 16:22, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]