This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This page is about an active politician who is running for office or has recently run for office, is in office and campaigning for re-election, or is involved in some current political conflict or controversy. Because of this, this article is at increased risk of biased editing, talk-page trolling, and simple vandalism.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject IrelandTemplate:WikiProject IrelandIreland articles
Hi, I've edited Heather Humphreys in an attempt at compromise. So, rather than foisting your Pov and OR on her, I used a quote from the source you provided, i.e. her own words. I've also removed the ref from a blog as that falls under unreliable refs. I would also appreciate it if you don't link your pet article here. Snappy (talk) 12:02, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Snappy, insisting someone who desribes themselves as a Protestant Ulsterwoman is not an Ulster Protestant doesn't come across as much of a compromise. Gob Lofa (talk) 12:08, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Why do you say "pov" and "fork"? Gob Lofa (talk) 12:15, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Because your article is a pov fork of Protestantism in Ireland. Snappy (talk) 13:36, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
What point of view are you referring to? Gob Lofa (talk) 18:54, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I must be asking you the same question for nigh on two years. Will you ever answer it? Gob Lofa (talk) 19:09, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I've answered the same questions over and over again. You just won't accept an answer and keep asking again. This being a case in point. All you do is keep asking questions and having endless pointless discussions. See Talk:Billy Fox as an example. Snappy (talk) 13:40, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Yes you have, just a pity they're never the questions I ask. Why would I accept an answer that dodges the question? Case in point, what point of view are you talking about? If you feel you've already answered this question, can you show me where? Gob Lofa (talk) 15:20, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I have. Stop dodging the question. Gob Lofa (talk) 16:26, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
From WP:NPOV (and repeated at WP:CFORK): "A POV fork is an attempt to evade the neutrality policy by creating a new article about a subject that is already treated in an article, often to avoid or highlight negative or positive viewpoints or facts." Do you believe negative or positive viewpoints or facts are being avoided or highlighted at Ulster Protestants? Gob Lofa (talk) 17:03, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Any questions on Protestants of Ulster article should be discussed on that articles talk page, not here. Snappy (talk) 21:18, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
You're referring to a "pov fork article" on this talk page. Gob Lofa (talk) 21:24, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
See above, your comment on 13 September. Do you reckon you'll get another two years out of it? Gob Lofa (talk) 11:41, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I don't believe I hold any records for refusing to answer questions. If you have a question for me, fire away. Please answer mine though. Gob Lofa (talk) 12:53, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Any questions on Protestants of Ulster article should be discussed on that articles talk page, not here. Snappy (talk) 16:41, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I'm asking why you're referring to a "pov fork article" on this talk page and why you're deleting the link to that article from this one. If you'd like to unburden yourself about negative or positive viewpoints etc. over at that talk page also, do feel free. Gob Lofa (talk) 11:28, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Snappy, you haven't addressed these points either here or at the talk page you suggested. What's the story? Gob Lofa (talk) 19:57, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Any questions on Protestants of Ulster article should be discussed on that articles talk page, not here. Snappy (talk) 07:15, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
That's my point, Snappy. You're refusing to discuss the question there also, which puts your refusal here in another perspective. Gob Lofa (talk) 10:07, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Do you dispute this? Gob Lofa (talk) 15:40, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Any questions on Protestants of Ulster article should be discussed on that articles talk page, not here. Snappy (talk) 21:16, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
That's my point, Snappy. You're refusing to discuss the question there also, which puts your refusal here in another perspective. I can assure you, if you answer it there, I won't ask it anywhere else. Gob Lofa (talk) 21:24, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]