Talk:Heather Henderson

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

COI by Sgerbic[edit]

I personally know Heather Henderson and have worked with her on several projects (as you can see from the text) I can even call her a friend. With that said, everything on this page checks out and she earned every bit of it. I do not have this page on my watchlist and will not bother anyone who works on it. I wrote it because it needed to be done. I was waiting for the release of the James Van Praagh video to add to the skepticism area, I'm told that will be available any day now. Once released it needs to be added. Also I believe she is uploading audio which needs to be added. Enjoy! Sgerbic (talk) 04:57, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Heather Henderson. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:36, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Non-encyclopedic[edit]

I came to this article from a link on the United Church of Bacon website. The article suffers from a subjective style that wobbles between "magazine profile" and "secularist outreach." Neither is appropriate for a Wikipedia article. (In my opinion, both moves tend to cheapen rather than elevate the subject of any Wikipedia article.) Heather Henderson is notable and deserves a better article.

That's why I flagged the article today as needing an encyclopedic tone. Y'all please jump in and help improve it.

I removed two liftout quotes and made a redirect from Baby Heather. Other needed changes include IMO a more neutral style, far fewer direct quotes (esp. sub-sentence quotes), no lifestyle reporting, no statements about how Henderson is feeling about things. This is a reference work, not Us Weekly. - ob C. alias ALAROB 19:03, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Alarob, I cleaned out a lot of what was left. Is it enough? Dunno... Schazjmd (talk) 21:48, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, @Schazjmd. It’s a lot better. There are a lot of obscure references that seem to assume prior knowledge, e.g. of “Dr. Sketchy’s Anti-Art School.” What is that? If it needs a long explanation and doesn’t have a Wikipedia article to link to, it should probably be left out. — ob C. alias ALAROB 19:04, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I was going to see if the source gave us a brief description we could use, but to my surprise, there is an article, Dr Sketchy's Anti-Art School. Added a wikilink. Schazjmd (talk) 19:14, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Perfect. — ob C. alias ALAROB 21:30, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]