Talk:Hawkesbury, Ontario

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

Also, Hawkesbury boasts the largest percentage of white trash per capita in all of Canada. --

While I don't directly support the above statement, I take issue with the description of the downtown as being very attractive. The core is made up of ugly storefronts and empty commerces. The construction on the outskirts of town hasn't helped this at all, of course, moving commerce to the outskirts of the city to the ever-present 'big box stores'. There is not one place in the downtown area that would seem sufficiently inviting for a coffee, cake and a moment of relaxation. No place for an ice cream or anything else. Why on earth did City Hall allow developers to build retail stores on the outskirts of town while dozens of business spaces sit empty and abandoned on Main and other streets? Now, there is no “heart of downtown”.

Why have the City Fathers and Mothers done so little to try to beautify the town? Much can be done with benches, flowers, trees etc. Why is there no effort to make much of the river that runs through the town? There should be restaurants and coffee shops on those shores as one would find in other towns..

Do you think this statment is O.K?:

It has a very nice neighbourhood called 'Mont-Roc' built during the 1950-1980 era where the elite live.

It's the "nice" I'm wondering about.I'm not sure if it's neutral enough for Wikipedia.--Granpire Viking Man 13:48, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

As a former resident of Hawkesbury, I cannot refute the "white trash" statement. Theres a joke in Hawkesbury that asks "why does the population of Hawkesbury never change? Because every time a baby is born, another dead-beat dad skips town" Per capita, Hawkesbury is rumored to have one of the worst drug problems in Canada. However, I feel that wikipedia is hardly the venue to trash talk a dirty small town. Like the population or not, the town does attract tourism to Eastern Ontario, due mainly to it's close proximity to Grenville and the cottage country there-in. In regards to the "Mont-Roc" statement, after having lived in the town for a year and the surrounding area for the majority of my life, I don't recall ever hearing the name Mont-Roc. The downtown area consists of one main street and the store front are gawdy and outdated. It brings to mind East End Montreal, with dirty back alleys and lackluster architecture.

I disagree with the comparison to East End Montreal: both areas are poor but there is some uniformity in the architecture in the East End with some very fine buildings and streets. Nothing fine or anything resembling “architecture” exists in Hawkesbury. There is little but ugly “siding” from one end of the town to the other. As a small town, Hawkesbury is not dirty, dusty and possessing of the “big city vibe” that one can attribute to East End Montreal.


I'm sorry but the white trash capital of Canada cannot be Hawkesbury; the title already is held by St. Catharines, Ontario...also known as Goon Town. —Preceding unsigned comment added by

hawksburry is hand down! the most depressing, dirty and saddest town in north america. the population is a ratio of 5% common folk and 95% bums, junkies and fucking losers! i would pay to see it burn down, the whole comunity is a waste of oxygen. sincerly a prescott-russell resident. 209.29.82.104 (talk) 14:29, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Hawkesbury, Ontario. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:41, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]