Talk:Harveys Lake (Pennsylvania)

A fact from Harveys Lake (Pennsylvania) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 2 March 2015 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that Harveys Lake, the largest natural lake in Pennsylvania by volume, was discovered by accident?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2015/March. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Harveys Lake (Pennsylvania).

Wikipedia

Harveys Lake (Pennsylvania) has been listed as one of the Geography and places good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: January 21, 2016. (Reviewed version).

Lakes Low‑importance

	Lakes portal Harveys Lake (Pennsylvania) is within the scope of WikiProject Lakes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of lake-related articles on Wikipedia, using the tools on the project page. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LakesWikipedia:WikiProject LakesTemplate:WikiProject LakesLakes articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Pennsylvania Low‑importance

	Pennsylvania portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pennsylvania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pennsylvania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PennsylvaniaWikipedia:WikiProject PennsylvaniaTemplate:WikiProject PennsylvaniaPennsylvania articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Harveys Lake (Pennsylvania)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Will211 (talk · contribs) 22:58, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Well written[edit]

the prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct

it complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation

Change the link that says streamboat to steamboat.-Done

Fix sentence As was expected of them.-Done

Fix any other minor errors, such as needed commas or badly worded sentences.-Done

Verifiable with no original research[edit]

it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline

all in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines

it contains no original research

it contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism

Broad in its coverage[edit]

it addresses the main aspects of the topic

it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail

Neutral[edit]

it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each

Stable[edit]

it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute

It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate[edit]

images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content

images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions

Final Thoughts[edit]

As seen above, the article meets GA Criteria. Only thoughts are try to limit staccato (short) sentences (such as sentences with only 4-6 words), if possible. This creates smoother reading for the reader.

Also, I've made a few changes to the article (such as rewording sentences, etc.). Now the article looks good to go!

Overall[edit]

Article meets GA Guidelines

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Harveys Lake (Pennsylvania). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:11, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]