Talk:Hartsel, Colorado

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Colorado portal This article is supported by WikiProject Colorado, our collaboration to improve, create, and update Wikipedia articles about the U.S. State of Colorado. To comment about this article, select the New section tab above. For questions about, or to make suggestions for Colorado articles, go to our project's talk page. We invite you to join us!

Villages

Hartsel, Colorado is within the scope of WikiProject Villages, a collaborative attempt at improving Wikimedia content with the help of openly licensed materials and improving Wikipedia articles related to Villages. If you would like to participate, visit the project page for more information.VillagesWikipedia:WikiProject VillagesTemplate:WikiProject VillagesVillages articles

Census info for an unincorporated town?[edit]

Something's strange about some of the information given on this page. The population is said to come from the 2000 census, and other data looks like census data; but Hartsel is an unincorporated town, which shouldn't be listed there. The fact that ArkyBot didn't find it makes me even more suspicious. I checked, but I could find no information about Hartsel, CO on http://factfinder.census.gov/

Can someone provide a more specific reference?

Thanks! -- Ken g6 02:43, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, and the English and metric units don't match, either. -- Ken g6 02:49, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WELL HOT SHIT[edit]

Ken, did you try looking Hartsel up by its zip code of 80449? Lots of information there using the zip code. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.53.16.138 (talk) 18:02, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That's interesting. There is a lot of information there, but it all seems to be demographic. That shows where some of the data comes from, but not things like town area.

The only geographic information I see so far is a ZIP code map. That ZIP code covers a very large area, much larger than the town; but that could explain why the stated town area is much larger than, e.g. the nearby City of Woodland Park which has 10 times as many residents.

While it can be hard to define the borders of an unincorporated town, if all of the census data applies to the ZIP code, I don't think the data should be stated as applying only to the town. Woodland Park's ZIP code, for instance, also includes communities like Crystola. Do you think it would be better to state that the data applies to the entire ZIP code, or to remove the data entirely?

-- Ken g6 22:16, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Hartsel, Colorado. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:48, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]