Talk:Hartfield

Merge proposal

In accordance with [1] the Wikipedia notes on writing about settlements, one of the recommendations is that, in order to reduce the number of stubs, villages and other settlements within a civil parish should be in one article. Hence the proposal I have made for the Hammerwood article to be incorporated here; I am in fact including the information already, so that it can be seen that the Wiki recommendation is eminently reasonable: it brings this article up to beyond a stub, and reduces East Sussex stubs by two, since it is also possible to incorporate the Hammerwood Park article here as well Peter Shearan (talk) 10:47, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

the lists in the original under the heading Demographics were listed straight from what is now the reference. the Pooh sticks bridge crops up all over the country! Peter Shearan (talk) 14:11, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Dumb Question

The article lists the dialing code for the Parish of Hartfield as 01892. This is true of the Village of Harfield, but other places in the Parish are served from different exchanges. Colemans Hatch and Marsh Green are under the 01342 (East Grinstead) dialing code.

How is this best rectified? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Daveph (talk • contribs) 00:15, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

The template allows for more dialling codes, I have added 01342. Putney Bridge (talk) 19:31, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

Merge proposal of Upper Hartfield

No justification here, although policy is that all inhabited settlements are inherently notable; in the absence of reasons, or objections, I'm removing this proposal as "no consensus". Rodhullandemu 23:56, 19 October 2009 (UTC)

List of businesses in Hartfield

The link does not work. How can this be fixed? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89speedster (talk • contribs) 07:52, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Hartfield. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080403205306/http://www.hartfieldonline.com/council-index.html to http://www.hartfieldonline.com/council-index.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080501062655/http://www.hartfieldonline.com/business.html to http://www.hartfieldonline.com/business.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080422220638/http://www.jungleboffin.com/mp3/concerts.htm to http://www.jungleboffin.com/mp3/concerts.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080422225937/http://www.roughwood.net/ChurchAlbum/EastSussex/Holtye/HoltyeStPeter2004.htm to http://www.roughwood.net/ChurchAlbum/EastSussex/Holtye/HoltyeStPeter2004.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080404142407/http://www.hartfieldonline.com/about-hartfield.html to http://www.hartfieldonline.com/about-hartfield.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:40, 30 October 2017 (UTC)