Talk:Harold L. George/GA1
GA Review[edit]
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 23:23, 19 December 2009 (UTC) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it reasonably well written?
- A. Prose quality:
- B. MoS compliance:
- Lead too short; ranks not relevant for a lead.
- A. Prose quality:
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
needs one cite
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- C. No original research:
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
Did he marry and have a family?
- B. Focused:
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
- Okay, I see your comments but I will not be online enough to fix them until about December 28. I'm very interested in making the article as good as it can be, so thanks in advance for a few days of leeway. Binksternet (talk) 00:59, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
- There's no real urgency, despite what the boilerplate says. God knows I'm not getting a whole lot of my own stuff done this month. But I will formally put it on hold if you need more time after the first of the year.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 03:42, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
- Okay, I see your comments but I will not be online enough to fix them until about December 28. I'm very interested in making the article as good as it can be, so thanks in advance for a few days of leeway. Binksternet (talk) 00:59, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
<=Lede has been expanded, with ranks taken out. More to follow. Binksternet (talk) 03:51, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
- Lede looks good.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 08:00, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
- I think the questions about sources are all cleared up. I have found a very small bit of information about the name of the wife and the fact of four children surviving him. Are we there yet? Binksternet (talk) 06:05, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
- Just about. Add the location of death to the infobox and we'll be done.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 19:41, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
- Okay, infobox now has place of death. Binksternet (talk) 00:06, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
- Just about. Add the location of death to the infobox and we'll be done.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 19:41, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
- I think the questions about sources are all cleared up. I have found a very small bit of information about the name of the wife and the fact of four children surviving him. Are we there yet? Binksternet (talk) 06:05, 7 January 2010 (UTC)