Talk:Hard–easy effect
 | Hard–easy effect has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: November 2, 2017. (Reviewed version). |
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Hard–easy effect article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
Untitled[edit]
I do not understand the example. What is its point? Which of these questions is easy or hard? According to Wikipedia at least, the 'modern' zipper was invented in 1913, and there were part-way stages allowing for ambiguaty going back decades earlier (as is so often the case). As for the birth of Buddha, no one is truly sure... and there are good guesses before and after that of Socrates... 19:01, 10 November 2013 2602:306:3134:5310:e2f8:47ff:fe36:92dc
- Someone corrected the Example section to say Aristotle instead of Socrates to more accurately reflect the content of the cited research article. I've copy-edited a bit, but it still fails to characterize the actual experimental results. The two questions were two of 50 general-knowledge questions, and these 50 were combined with randomized questions about the relative size of 65 German cities with population over 100,000. I could only find a Google Books copy of the research article, and was unable to read the whole thing, so exactly how the determination of "easy" vs "hard" remains unclear to me. (And I don't want to get any further into original research.)
- I removed the "underlinked" tag, since that's not this article's problem at all. It's just a stub and needs lots of improvement. This Example section that someone put in some years ago is just a small step, but has problems of its own. --jmcgnh(talk) (contribs) 05:59, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
External links modified[edit]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Hard–easy effect. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130212233139/http://www.cbdr.cmu.edu/papers/pdfs/cdr_576.pdf to http://www.cbdr.cmu.edu/papers/pdfs/cdr_576.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:50, 26 June 2017 (UTC)