Talk:Hanna–Honeycomb House

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is almost exactly a copy of the article it references![edit]

Is this plagiarism? A violation of copyright? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Jlowery (talkcontribs) 05:50, 13 March 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Yes to the first, no to the second. The original source is the National Parks Service, a US federal government agency. Works of the US federal government are in the public domain. Thus, no copyright infringement. But, I just did add some more info from an old Stanford news article (which is copyrighted, so that I had to summarize). howcheng {chat} 05:53, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The "NPS" tag suggesting someone was proud that the article incorporated text from a National Park Service website is a clear indication that the article is plagiarized. I suppose if it is plagiarized, it is better to acknowledge that than not. The article is now a mess, a mixture of plagiarized text and newly written text. I am inclined to blank it out and start over, although that would lose some new written text. I marked it with "refimprove" tag for the moment, may return to blank it all out. doncram (talk) 20:31, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hanna–Honeycomb House. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:02, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]