Jeb! The Musical was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 27 November 2016 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Hamilton (musical). The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hip hop, a collaborative effort to build a useful resource for and improve the coverage of hip hop on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Hip hopWikipedia:WikiProject Hip hopTemplate:WikiProject Hip hopHip hop articles
Hamilton (musical) is part of WikiProject Musical Theatre, organized to improve and complete musical theatre articles and coverage on Wikipedia. You can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Musical TheatreWikipedia:WikiProject Musical TheatreTemplate:WikiProject Musical TheatreMusical Theatre articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the history of the United States on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United States HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject United States HistoryTemplate:WikiProject United States HistoryUnited States History articles
This article has been viewed enough times in a single year to make it into the Top 50 Report annual list. This happened in 2020, when it received 9,983,134 views.
This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report6 times. The weeks in which this happened:
I have removed the reference to a booking until date. It is an open ended run so not necessary. Mark E (talk) 02:53, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected edit request on 10 April 2023[edit]
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.
In the differences in the play to real life, although it’s true that Hamilton wrote the letter that references the comma, it’s untrue that Angelica “knocked it down.” There isn’t any direct references to it in subsequent letters. The only thing cited is a tweet. It also isn’t really true that their relationship is exaggerated in the play. It’s really a matter of opinion, and many historians actually believe they had an affair. Many of their contemporaries believed they were, as well. KnoxBlue (talk) 04:01, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected edit request on 10 April 2023 (2)[edit]
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.
In the historical accuracy section, remove where it says Angelica “knocked it down.” about the flirty comma letter. The tweet cited is inaccurate. There isn’t any direct mention of it in their subsequent letters. KnoxBlue (talk) 04:14, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected edit request on 13 April 2023[edit]
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.
add the following paragraph to Concept-Critical analysis and scholarship:
Philosopher Michael Sandel critiques Hamilton for its oversimplistic multiculturalism, avoidance of discussions on Hamilton's financial doctrines, and a blind embrace of liberal meritocracy in his 2022 edition of Democracy's Discontent.[1] Harvard intellectual historian Hansong Li, in his review of Hamilton in the Shanghai Review of Books, praises the musical for its innovations but critiques it for erecting a heroic myth to satisfy both economic elites and cultural warriors, which ultimately fails to unite a deeply divided American public.[2]199.94.1.17 (talk) 14:59, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
^Li, Hansong. "李汉松｜音乐剧《汉密尔顿》的历史基础和时下语境". Shanghai Review of Book 上海書評. The Paper 澎湃. Retrieved 13 April 2023.
Partly done: In general, reviews should be either published by a publication with an article, or written by an author with an article. Snowmanonahoe (talk) 02:38, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The page is locked, but how can I add a section to the article about how many online bloggers have discussed how much despite many people claiming to have enjoyed this musical, that when asked discreetly about the musical 79% of respondents to the question said the they hated the musical, and that in the words of many, "it sucked ass!" 47.149.186.81 (talk) 02:22, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
And that, is why the page is locked. Mark E (talk) 09:44, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected edit request on 7 December 2023[edit]
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.
Change “The Chicago production of Hamilton began preview performances at the CIBC Theatre in September 2017 and opened the following month.” to “The Chicago production of Hamilton began preview performances at the CIBC Theatre in September 2016 and opened the following month.”
level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Done Actualcpscm (talk) 09:51, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
Partly done: In general, reviews should be either published by a publication with an article, or written by an author with an article. Snowmanonahoe (talk) 02:38, 23 April 2023 (UTC)