Talk:Hamburg Inn No. 2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Reputation[edit]

Sorry, but Hamburg Inn does not have a reputation of "some of the best hamburgers in town". In fact, their reputation varies quite a bit depending on who you speak with. Official UI visitors guides tend to downplay the restaurant. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.217.235.209 (talkcontribs) 29 October 2006 22:18 (UTC)

I'll second the above opinion. The food is OK, but not great. Of course, I suspect their food is kind of in line with the whole 50s-time-capsule thing and it's sort of like food was in the 50s. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.221.245.236 (talkcontribs) 2 November 2006 00:15 (UTC)

It's not necessarily for the food that people are drawn to the burg. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.226.234.230 (talkcontribs) 8 December 2006 13:04 (UTC)

Actually, Hamburg Inn No. 2 consistently wins Best Burger in the Press-Citizen's "Best of the Area" feature each year. The Hero of This Nation (talk) 21:57, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Work in progress[edit]

Sourcing and more info come. - Jaysus Chris 21:02, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hamburg Inn No. 2. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:36, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]