Talk:HPE Integrity Servers

Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Computer hardware task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Inclusion of Link for driving HP Integrity business[edit]

HP handed out a HP Integrity award in July 2006 to a company called RichardsoNEyres for their efforts in driving Integrity business. Does anyone object to the placing of an external link at the end of this page highlighting the award? I received conformation of this through an online newsletter. The link to the company is below:

http://www.richardsoneyres.com/case_studies/hp.html

What he means is, is anyone willing to place this ext link in the article, since I already objected to him doing so (based solely on his contribs, nothing about this article or link, so if anyone thinks it's good, OK by me). Dicklyon 02:26, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Clarification needed re fortifications with HP-UX[edit]

I've tagged the sentence: "while fortifying Windows® and Linux environments with innovations from HP-UX within the next two years"

As HP-UX is an OS and so are Windows and Linux, a given server won't be running both at once (unless virtualized) and so improvements from HP-UX couldn't affect the other two in the sense this seems to imply. Perhaps this was meant to indicate that HP-UX is being positioned to be deployed in datacenters alongside Windows and Linux servers. I find the wording very ambiguous, but I'm not an expert on this line of products so I don't know what was intended. BrandyLova (talk) 13:30, 22 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

My guess is that it was a euphemism that they were realizing the reality of HP-UX being a dead-end, so making it easier for customers to move to more main-stream operating systems in some way? Anyway, needed all sorts of other cleanup, since it seemed like a cut-n-paste from a marketing blurb, complete with the trademark symbols that we generally do not use in text. W Nowicki (talk) 22:21, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]