Talk:HMS Stronghold

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:HMS Stronghold/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: The Rambling Man (talk · contribs) 18:38, 5 September 2021 (UTC)

Comments

• "The ship is significant as one " -> "The ship was one "

Fixed.

• "RAE 1921 Target" no article??

Not yet. I have added a redlink.

• "over twenty" more than twenty

Fixed.

• "in 1941 and, in 1942" perhaps "and the following year"

Good idea.

• "the Australian vessel's" Royal Australian Navy vessel (and link)

Done.

• could link reconnaissance, and also seaplane.

Done.

• "300 tons of oil " avoid starting sentences with numerals, and convert, what kind of tons?

Reworded, converted and linked.

• "single 40-millimetre (1.6 in) 2-pounder pom-pom" was it really measured in millimetres when the mass was in pounds?

Yes. The 40-mm was called a 2-pounder.

• "Fire control" link?

Done.

• "the RAE 1921 Target" unmanned vehicle.

Done

• "thirty-eight mines" 38?

I think it reads better in words.

• "The Second World War" heading, no need for The.

Removed.

• "the capital ship" what's one of those.

In this case, a battlecruiser. Linked.

• "15 and 22 kn (28 and 41 km/h; 17 and 25 mph)." no ref.

Fixed.

• "seaplane 300 mi (480 km) south of Bali.[23] The seaplane reported the position of the British vessel to the Japanese fleet." merge this, e.g. "seaplane 300 mi (480 km) south of Bali,[23] which reported its position to the Japanese fleet...."

Done.

• Evans, year range needs en-dash.

Fixed.

• Sturtivant and Womack likewise.

Fixed.

That's all I have. The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 21:48, 5 September 2021 (UTC)

@The Rambling Man: Thank you for your review. I have made the changes. simongraham (talk)