Talk:HMS Prince of Wales (1902)

HMS Prince of Wales (1902) has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

HMS Prince of Wales (1902) is part of the Predreadnought battleships of the Royal Navy series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
April 10, 2016	Good article nominee	Listed
August 23, 2020	Good topic candidate	Promoted

Current status: Good article

United Kingdom Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

Military history: Maritime / British / European / World War I / Operation Majestic Titan

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	World War I task force
	Operation Majestic Titan (Phase I)

Wales Low‑importance

	Wales portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wales, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Wales on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WalesWikipedia:WikiProject WalesTemplate:WikiProject WalesWales articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article was created or improved during the "The 20,000 Challenge: UK and Ireland", which started on 20 August 2016 and is still open. You can help!

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:HMS Prince of Wales (1902)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Parsecboy (talk · contribs) 11:43, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'll grab this one. Parsecboy (talk) 11:43, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No dupe links
File:HMS Prince of Wales (1902) in 1912 2.jpg - I don't think this copyright tag is correct - us not knowing the identity of a photographer from a book published 7 decades after the photo was taken is not the same as the photo having been published anonymously. Same with File:HMS Prince of Wales (1902) at Malta 1915.jpg and File:HMS Prince of Wales (1902) awaiting scrapping.jpg.
- Didn't even think to double-check the licenses for these :-( Found the first one on the IWM site and reworked the license. Deleted the other two.
I spy an un-italicized London in the first paragraph of the Design section.
You might work a link to Adriatic Campaign of World War I in the relevant paragraph. Alternatively, I generally like to add a couple of lines on the general situation in the Adriatic to give readers a bit of context on what the campaign was link. See for instance the last paragraph in Italian cruiser Partenope.

Not too much to complain about. Great work as usual. Parsecboy (talk) 12:09, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

- See how it reads now. I was so focused on using the Halpern book that I'd just gotten from ILL that I didn't even think of looking at the one that I already had to hand.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 16:55, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Parsecboy: Everything's been addressed now I think? Looks good to pass?♦ Dr. Blofeld 14:30, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

All looks good to me. Parsecboy (talk) 22:42, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]